|
Experienced
physicians generally have an established level of comfort with patient interaction
in the examination room. Some
find it awkward to consider using another means of documenting the visit,
for fear of alienating the patient. Younger
physicians are typically more comfortable with computer interaction.
There's
really nothing new in the patient perception about this issue. Most people
are enormously tolerant of the processes involved in medical practice. They
are inspected inside and out, poked with needles and other devices, endure
the injection and withdrawal of fluids from their bodies, and are often deprived
clothing. Knowing all this,
some practitioners still object to a computer in the examination room, because
it might offend the patient! Computers
and electronic data systems are ubiquitous in everyday life. Patients
who are ignored, or alienated from the clinical process, will most likely
be upset at the practitioner who is not paying attention to their needs.
A
recent family practice management journal article pointed out that since
patients do not have objective measures of practitioner quality, many use
surrogate markers to choose between practices. Staff
friendliness, on-time and available appointments, and facility cleanliness
and efficiency are examples of these markers. At the Ulrich Medical Clinic,
patient response to the Team Chart
Concept has been universally favorable with many new patients joining
our practice because we have a modern system. People
now have a new way of evaluating the quality of a medical practice that
allows them to participate directly in their care. When
they see that the practitioner and the technology are working together
for their benefit, they become the strongest proponents for this technology.
|